NO.263 Robin, a professional hacker, targeted an organization’s network to sniff all the traffic. During this process.
STP prevents bridging loops in a redundant switched network environment. By avoiding loops, you can ensure that broadcast traffic does not become a traffic storm.
STP is a hierarchical tree-like topology with a “root” switch at the top. A switch is elected as root based on the lowest configured priority of any switch (0 through 65,535). When a switch boots up, it begins a process of identifying other switches and determining the root bridge. After a root bridge is elected, the topology is established from its perspective of the connectivity. The switches determine the path to the root bridge, and all redundant paths are blocked. STP sends configuration and topology change notifications and acknowledgments (TCN/TCA) using bridge protocol data units (BPDU).
An STP attack involves an attacker spoofing the root bridge in the topology. The attacker broadcasts out an STP configuration/topology change BPDU in an attempt to force an STP recalculation. The BPDU sent out announces that the attacker’s system has a lower bridge priority. The attacker can then see a variety of frames forwarded from other switches to it. STP recalculation may also cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition on the network by causing an interruption of 30 to 45 seconds each time the root bridge changes. An attacker using STP network topology changes to force its host to be elected as the root bridge.
NO.267 At a government research lab, cybersecurity officer Nikhil is compiling a vulnerability assessment report after scanning the internal subnet. As part of his documentation, he lists the IP addresses of all scanned hosts and specifies which machines are affected. He includes tables categorizing discovered vulnerabilities by type such as outdated software, default credentials, and open ports.
In CEH-aligned vulnerability assessment reporting, the Findings section is where the assessor documents what was discovered during scanning and validation in a clear, structured, and actionable way. This portion of the report typically contains the concrete results: identified assets, affected systems, vulnerability details, and evidence that supports each issue. The question states that Nikhil lists the IP addresses of scanned hosts, identifies which machines are affected, and includes tables categorizing vulnerabilities such as outdated software, default credentials, and open ports. These are classic “results” artifacts that belong in Findings because they communicate the observed security weaknesses and where they exist.
NO.277 In Atlanta, Georgia, ethical hacker James Patel is hired by Southern Retail, a major e-commerce chain, to test the security of their online shopping platform. During his penetration test, James aims to simulate a session hijacking attack by setting up a proxy to intercept HTTP traffic between customers and the platform, log the requests, and perform advanced searches on the captured data to identify session tokens. He needs a lightweight tool specifically designed for security research that can handle these tasks in a controlled environment to demonstrate vulnerabilities to the company’s security team. Which tool should James use to perform this session hijacking simulation?
The requirement is a lightweight proxy tool designed for security research that can intercept HTTP traffic, log requests, and allow advanced searching to identify session tokens. Hetty fits this description as a modern, lightweight HTTP toolkit built specifically for interception, analysis, and research tasks in controlled testing environments.
NO.278 Steve, an attacker, created a fake profile on a social media website and sent a request to Stella. Stella was enthralled by Steve’s profile picture and the description given for his profile, and she initiated a conversation with him soon after accepting the request. After a few days. Sieve started asking about her company details and eventually gathered all the essential information regarding her company. What is the social engineering technique Steve employed in the above scenario?
The honey trap is a technique where an attacker targets a person online by pretending to be an attractive person and then begins a fake online relationship to obtain confidential information about the target company. In this technique, the victim is an insider who possesses critical information about the target organization.
No Responses